When reviewing the final search results from your chosen databases (and other sources if relevant), multiple reviewers (you and your supervisors or co-reviewers) will make decisions on which articles to include and exclude based on the criteria specified in your protocol. The first stage of this is usually based on titles and abstracts, then a full-text analysis follows before data extraction.
You can use a range of tools that can be used to store citations and do the screening.
At CAHS Medical Library we support EndNote (reference manager), which can assist you streamline the review process by storing all your citations in your EndNote library for extraction onto your tools below if required.
Managing the selection process can be challenging, particularly in large-scale systematic review that involves multiple reviewers
Various free and subscription-based tools available that support the study selection process are as follows:
(Note: CAHS Medical Library does not have subscription to offer support for these tools, except for SUMARI.
As each reviewer assesses the articles returned by the searches, they must adhere to the inclusion and exclusion criteria that were defined in the protocol. A checklist or table will assist with this.
Example:
Author | Study aim | Location | Data collection & analysis methods | Results/ | Relevant to topic/ |
Date | Hypothesis | Study design | Findings | research question | |
Journal | Research questions | Participants |